Impulse 9 Posted September 5, 2019 Opposing for Multiple Reasons. Core issue is Charter 1.1. User is unable to preform ANY duty within the community in a mature and professional manner. User is unable to not joke around at every opportunity. I strongly object to this user being put in any position that requires maturity or professionalism as they are unable to filter or give a strong presence other than joking around. Much less treating any issue with any level of maturity - race/sex/gender and other joke missions the user has made in the past. The inability for this user to be mature is not someone that I will support in being a GM representative in the community. EDIT - Due to Officer level counter - this is now an informal poll between officers lasting 1 week. Share this post Link to post
James Posted September 5, 2019 (edited) 5 hours ago, Impulse 9 said: Core issue is Charter 1.1. User is unable to preform ANY duty within the community in a mature and professional manner. User is unable to not joke around at every opportunity. I strongly object to this user being put in any position that requires maturity or professionalism as they are unable to filter or give a strong presence other than joking around. Much less treating any issue with any level of maturity - race/sex/gender and other joke missions the user has made in the past. The inability for this user to be mature is not someone that I will support in being a GM representative in the community. I don't have a vote, but fully concur with this sentiment. Stories of linking polls while admin-ing the server regarding the user base's opinions of women's body weight in recent weeks is not becoming of a GM, heck even a regular. I implore officers to back Impulse and block this. Edited September 5, 2019 by James Share this post Link to post
PaxJaromeMalues Posted September 6, 2019 (edited) Opposing (saw too late that its Officer vote now) Edited September 6, 2019 by PaxJaromeMalues Share this post Link to post
Force_Majeure Posted September 7, 2019 I'm exercising my right as a regular to comment in this thread. Force Share this post Link to post
HeadShot Posted September 9, 2019 Shoot your shot, Soviet is a wholesome fun instigating member of the community, unfortunately he's administratively unaligned with the core direction of 'mature' game-play, I feel he's not interested, which is the reason. He's a very capable member in terms of play style and in-game organizational ability. Maybe ya'll see the light in the future Share this post Link to post
VPope Posted September 16, 2019 Nomination fails due to officer vote Yes 0 No 2 (100%) Share this post Link to post