Jump to content

2.2 - Personnel Removal Operations

2.2 - Personnel Removal Operations  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. 2.2 - Personnel Removal Operations (Addition & Modifications)

    • Yes
    • No

Recommended Posts

Our Existing Charter has a large number of specifically defined creations of polls and their duration/requirements that are repeated in multiple areas.

I would like to propose an organizational rewrite of the existing 5.x section and an addition to 2.x Operations section to simplify this repeat information.



Information Specifics, Intent of Changes


"2.2 - Personnel Removal Operation"

"2.2.1 - Personnel Removal Operations are Standard Operations that last for two (2) weeks and require a two-third (2/3) majority."

[NEW] - Definition of Personnel Removal - Uses existing 2 week and 2/3rd criteria, all other aspects inherited from Standard Operations.



" - New Regulars are inducted by a Standard Operation."

[CONDENSED] - Meaning and Existing rules are unchanged.

[PERSONAL] - Standard Operations defined by 2.x Match this definition at present, this keeps vote definitions in one location (2.x)



"5.2.7 - Regular Removals are inducted by a Personnel Removal Operation"

[CONDENSED] - Same meaning, with process defined by 2.2 (and subs).



"5.2.5 - Polls shall be created with a seven (7) day expiry enabled."

[REMOVAL] - Already defined by 2.x 



"5.2.6 - Polls shall have the "Public Poll" option disabled."

[REMOVAL] - Already defined by 2.x



"5.2.7 - Operations of Regular removal must be decided by a two (2) week two-thirds (2/3) majority vote."

[REMOVAL] - To be defined by 2.2.1



"5.3.4 - Officer Removals are inducted by a Personnel Removal Operation"

[CHANGE] - To be defined by 2.2.1



[PERSONAL] - This is not an intent to change how users are added/removed at present, simply to condense all operations to one section.  Any modification to how users are voted on or removed would need to be voted on at a later time.  This vote does not cover Officer Additions nor Delegate Removals as they do not fit within the condensed scopes defined by this poll.

This Poll requires a 3/4 Vote and 2 Weeks.

Share this post

Link to post

Consolidates many sentences into few for the same effect and meaning.


I support.


(There is a minor typo in in 2.2.1, should read "which" or "that"  (grammar nazi please confirm) after "Standard Operation"

Share this post

Link to post

Voting no, this is clearly a usurpation of the charter's rules, nothing needs to be clarified because it is perfect as written.


All this will do is confuse people.

Share this post

Link to post
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Create New...