Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


  • Gender
  • Location
    Washington, United States
  • Interests
    Vidja Gams

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Player in question is a friend of mine, was in a Skype call with him when this happened. He states it was an accident due to thinking Gear was still on G.
  2. http://forums.unitedoperations.net/index.php/user/2273-jaynus/ It doesn't take a fucking genius to dig up this information.
  3. I fail to see how whether or not he served in any army has any relevance to his ban appeal. To get back on topic, while I do feel that it would be alright to give him another chance, I feel that he should still serve some ban sentence after being accepted back in, if that actually happens.
  4. Shouldn't a ban be filed for Exhaust as well? I don't see him shooting NightDemonz after both of them have been downed as a justified reaction, though there may be missing/misinterpreted information.
  5. Why would you ever consider this a good idea whilst global, or at any time, even? Even if others are talking, your voice (obviously) still transmits to them. Right, you shouted penis for the sake of tactical gameplay. Not an excuse. A lapse of proper judgement still constitutes appropriate action in response to it.
  6. Absolute nonsense. The manner in which Bandit chose to act based on his supposed annoyance at the community was entirely his decision. He could have just as easily said "Hey, I don't want to play here anymore. Bye". His actions were his and his alone. His reasoning for them does not matter, nor does it matter who caused him to decide to act in this manner. What he did was a serious offense against the rules of this community, and he was punished as such.
  7. While that is a possibility, THINKING that he doesn't enjoy UO's playstyle, and ACTING in an unacceptable manner based off of said thought are entirely different matters.
  8. http://forums.unitedoperations.net/index.php/topic/5133-how-to-become-a-regular/
  9. Tone doesn't translate well through text, so this isn't meant to sound abrasive or anything, but what about that did you feel was worth pointing out? Were you just thinking it funny, or did you mean it was relevant to this ban thread? Again, not to be abrasive, just curious as to why you noted this here.
  10. I don't think his age or impressionability or the natural state of such should factor into this at all. If he is going to play here, he should be held to the same standard as the rest of us.
  11. Whilst playing a mission (don't recall the name of it), Naizarak fired his grenade launcher on 2 separate occasions after being told repeatedly not to fire.
  12. I'm not really sure why the situation was represented by this censored individual as "Jake attempted to kill the server last night". A few of us in the server asked for domi, and co-op ended up being played. Myself and several others left the server, and while I can't speak of the others motives, I left the server at the time because I did not feel like playing more co-op. It was not with malicious intent, and I do not recall hearing any sort of talk about such from any of the others who left with me. As for the banning of Korupt that occurred, assuming that Jake didn't just blatantly lie about the reasons behind requesting it, shouldn't part of the blame be placed upon the one who banned him? Looking at Korupt's ban thread, there seemed to be a bit of confusion as to exactly who the CO is and what his rights as such are in these situations. Could this whole situation possibly be clarified a bit more so we, or at least myself, can form a better understanding of what happened?
  13. I was in that mission, and from what I recall it ran its course long after Jake asked for it to be called, and every player, save for a JIP or 2, ended up dying at the AO. Though if the logs say otherwise, I'm obviously wrong.
  14. That's his actual voice, Mauser.
  • Create New...