Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 


United Operations - A Tactical Gaming Community

ArmA 3 Mission List

ArmA 2 Mission List




Everything posted by j0zh94

  1. Removal of context is a relatively lazy way to push an agenda, anyone can edit something to make someone look bad. The admin at the time was frustrated that users left when a mission they didn't want to play was selected, afterwards he didn't take into account those users who were now in the waiting room (mission was a 45 and there were half a dozen in the waiting room). I went to clarify and after a small argument called the admins bluff, fortunately the mission broke. After a brief discussion afterwards with both Gkenny and Blue we reconciled our differences and agreed to prioritise what is best for the server. Nevertheless it was improper to do such a thing as a Regular and was rectified with the admin immediately after. Any further discussion of this incident however should be handled in my personal review thread and not on this poll.
  2. You have historically turned up drunk, belligerent and hostile on our TS3. You have been previously banned multiple times for this drunken behaviour and outside of these alcoholic crusades, to UO to preach "improvements", you are entirely absent. Your justification to unban you is that if we don't our relationship with AFI will die because you own the community. If our only connection to them is you then so be it, but we did not use you to orchestrate the last event. If you wish to attempt to threaten us with exclusion from future events then this ban is even more justified. No amount of events will justify allowing you to continue to harras and attack our community members. I hope you resolve your alcoholism before it consumes you.
  3. This is a vote I never really expected to see given Sacher’s rather colourful past but there is no doubt that he contributes the most to this community out of all non Regulars. His work towards Olsen’s as well mission making is extremely vital to the A3 side of this community. I believe over time he has matured and become far less argumentative and whilst not perfect, someone I could see maturely approaching key topics within our community. Voting yes
  4. http://forums.unitedoperations.net/index.php/page/ArmA3/missionlist/_/livemissions/tvt36-homeland-security-v2-r940? Error upon loading, gasmask error
  5. This section of the forum isn’t not accessible to those who aren’t in UOTC as I can not access that link it seems
  6. Blue's post was several hours before S4dguy posted his famil thread. I understand Blue lives in a timezone a few hours ahead but that does not enable him the ability to read into the future. Originally I was going to question why this thread states he runs courses yet none of the courses recently are run by him. Secondly this thread was so lazily posted I believe that has damaged S4d's chance. Hopefully S4dguy can respond when he becomes a donating member again.
  7. First play weekend I'd give this game a solid meh. It's Squad, no surprise, with a couple twists to make it more than a reskin. Some of these twists are cool, others are definitely lacking. The medic insta-revive I don't like, the vehicle/command spawn truck needs tweaking because it's easily open to abuse. Map design is poor in some places and the buildings were made to IRL scale, not game scale so getting stuck and clipping is rampant. In the end, the game screams modding team turned developers and like Squad, if they wish for this game to be taken seriously they need to hire some experienced game devs to bring the overall quality up.
  8. But you haven't stated why it's better other than some jazzy lines that look like they've been pulled from an IGN press release post. What makes this game better than Post Scriptum exactly, otherwise this is nothing more than clickbait
  9. http://forums.unitedoperations.net/index.php/page/ArmA3/missionlist/_/livemissions/tvt45-10thmtn-boulder-pass-v3-r1287? End condition fired really early, apache did nothing, magazines at base don't work with our weapon
  10. http://forums.unitedoperations.net/index.php/page/ArmA3/missionlist/_/livemissions/co37-highground-v11-r1005? Mortars don't fire as intended, AI attack not working as intended.
  11. Welcome back Heckman, I’m sure you’ll quickly realise not much has changed around here for better or for worse
  12. http://forums.unitedoperations.net/index.php/page/ArmA3/missionlist/_/livemissions/tvt50-daesh-dash-v2-r450? broken spectator, briefing doesn't meet requirements.
  13. Yes, your last event was the best we've had in over a year so I have confidence in your ability to produce more.
  14. http://forums.unitedoperations.net/index.php/page/ArmA3/missionlist/_/livemissions/tvt30-diet-cold-war-v1-r1294? No slots available
  15. The map is in the modpack regardless of how this vote goes, it looks better than when I voted yes to remove so now I'll vote yes to allow mission makers to use it again. We lose nothing by voting yes
  • Create New...