Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Yesterday
  2. for reference here is 1.4, 1.4 - All Regulars have a common influence on the direction and administration of the community. Voting yes
  3. As proposed during consultation phase of charter reorganisation this poll suggests the removal of 3.7 as it can be covered with 1.1 Replaced usage with Current 1.1 This poll requires a 3/4 vote lasting 2 weeks
  4. As proposed during consultation phase of charter reorganisation this poll suggests the modification of 3.5 Unnecessary additional text, there is no need to specify services when the statement says "all mediums and services" This poll requires a 3/4 vote lasting 2 weeks
  5. As proposed during consultation phase of charter reorganisation this poll suggests the removal of 3.4 as it can be moved into the description of Section 3 The line is a description of how rules and SOP's govern conduct, so its a description as a rule. Suggestion being we move it into the description This poll requires a 3/4 vote lasting 2 weeks
  6. As proposed during consultation phase of charter reorganisation this poll suggests the removal of 3.3 as it can be covered with 1.1 Replaced usage with Current 1.1 This poll requires a 3/4 vote lasting 2 weeks
  7. As proposed during consultation phase of charter reorganisation this poll suggests the removal of 3.2 as it can be covered with 1.1 Replaced usage with Current 1.1 This poll requires a 3/4 vote lasting 2 weeks
  8. As proposed during consultation phase of charter reorganisation this poll suggests the removal of current 1.4 and addition of explanatory text to Section 2 This removes the requirement for 1.4 to exist by moving it to the description line for Section 2 This poll requires a 3/4 vote lasting 2 weeks
  9. Last week
  10. In, unless work takes over weekends again. Can't wait to play with you guys again.
  11. Poll fails. Yes 12 (44.44%) No 15 (55.56%)
  12. Earlier
  13. We have been invited to attend a WW2 TVT event at AFI. Who: Any UO Member What: TVT Missions Where: at AFI When: 23 1750z NOV 2019 Why: to have fun! Additional details here (including mod-pack info): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BXgkhkkk_kmSkcqz-PFN2Z9b-0D_c6WQniMMHmjmpDg/edit# If you plan on attending, please reply below.
  14. TVT23 Dead Forest on Schwimmlitz - 84 loadouts borked for blufor
  15. Voting no for the same reason I stated in the discussion thread: there are people on the permaban list banned for non-in-game reasons who did things that I never ever want them unbanned for. I very much wish a lot of the people posting loud nos in this poll had posted in that thread so we wouldn't have to waste time with a poll like this.
  16. He went ahead and killed himself.
  17. No. I see no positives in this suggestion. "we can just ban them again....", while this is true, we already play so few Arma games a week, do you really want someone that we had BANNED in the past, come back in and fuck that one game up?... i don't. Nothing stops them from appealing their ban.
  18. Same shoes, got stuck at home after a knee surgery, 2 months to join UO again for some arma fun. Just one question thou, where's Zedic?!
  19. I voted yes, if people return and are still shitters we can just ban them again.
  20. I’d disagree, if the person has truly matured then they have nothing to fear in an appeal. If for some reason one returns and has not reformed, this puts a lot of unnecessary burden on the GMs and FMs to monitor and enforce the rules.
  21. I think this is right thing to do. Only because there is a way to appeal it does not mean that the former culprit feels comfortable to do so, especially if we keep in mind the level of strong attitude we are known for. It might help them to feel confident to return if we invite them back. We just need to be on watch for any returning behavioural patterns.
  22. Voting yes, we can reban them if we have to, alot of the people we banned were doing childish things. UO has been around for almost 10 years, they are older and most likely wiser now.
  23. Voting No. There is no wording that this is for game bans only, this would include all bans. There are over 113 people banned on the forums. some have been banned because of game related activities, and some have been banned for other reasons. Its the others I am concerned about. These non game related bans have no reason to be here. There is an appeal process let them use it. By way of appeals this shows that a person has shown first remorse for their actions and second a sign of maturity in that they can ask for forgiveness.
  24. No. If people want to return, they can appeal. If anyone is in contact with someone who wishes to return, encourage them to appeal. I helped Whitehead with his and that worked out fine.
  1. Load more activity
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...